The rise in internet usage
since the early 1990’s has produced a wide range of tools to process a continuously
expanding amount of information. One of these
tools, Wiki, developed in 1994 by Cunningham provides” collaborative web space
where anyone can add content and anyone can edit content that has already been
published” (Richardson, 2006, as cited by West & West, 2009, Loc. 214). The growth of the ability to not only read
the internet but also “write”/create data revolutionized internet usage and
acted as a springboard for today’s constantly evolving internet. In adult education, Wikis allow individuals
to collaborate within a group on the same project/assignment which produce
mixed results which I will explained below.
PROS
I believe the benefits
of Wiki’s outweigh the disadvantages when used in an environment with adult
learners. One of Knowles (1984, as cited
by King & Cox, pg. 122) tenants of andragogy, state that adults perform
better when they are presented with self-directed learning. Wikis help create the opportunity for self-directed
learning as the instructor generally only provides an initial prompt and the group
creates the knowledge contained within the Wiki. In this group learning environment, adult
learners are able to participate in a community of practice. The instructor can help facilitate this by
grouping students together with varying levels of expertise. Initially the more experienced members will instruct
the less experienced members on how to use a Wiki or how to gather/develop/create
knowledge for the Wiki. As time
progresses the previously less experienced members can join the group as fully
functioning members. This process also
mirrors Pratt’s (1998) Apprenticeship Perspective when teaching adult learners.
The teacher or other group members can
help facilitate learning by providing a scaffolding for newer/younger members. This scaffolding builds on previous knowledge
in order to create the knowledge required for the current class/project/wiki. Communities of practice and the Apprenticeship
Perspective both provide opportunities for learning outside of the traditional
teacher lead discussions. Wikis provide
an excellent opportunity for adult learners to shift to student directed
learning rather than a teacher directed learning environment (Hazari et al,
2009). As the opportunities for adult
learning to participate in formal education continue to grow in the online
space, the student-directed learning becomes even more important. For online or asynchronous education options,
the teacher is often not available for a traditional “chalk-and-talk” (King
& Cox, 2011, pg. 5) lesson. Warlick
(2007, as cited by King & Cox, 2001, pg. 125) also highlighted 3 areas
where Wikis offer a huge advantage for adult learners. In terms of facilitating learning they are,
practical, political, and timely. Wikis provide
the ability to generate a lot information in a short time using a format that
allows for everyone to contribute.
CONS
CONS
The disadvantage of
using Wikis are few but should not be ignored.
The most glaring example I noticed was the study Raman et al. (2005, as
cited by King & Cox, 2011, pg 128) completed, stating that Wikis were
mostly “used for managing and updating information rather than collaboratively
creating new knowledge.” The results
from this study goes against Knowles tenants of andragogy, especially the one
stating that adult learners are self-directed.
I believe further study may be needed in this area but the study was done
at an undergraduate level and the students were given the opportunity to use it
as they saw fit. This study also
highlights the importance of how the Wiki is implemented within the adult
learning structure. The teacher needs to
ensure it is set up to provide collaboration between group members while
creating new knowledge rather than only being an area to store additional
information. Mader (2007, as cited by
King & Cox, 2011, pg. 128) concluded that while there is no correct way to
use a Wiki, patterns are particularly important when building them. In a graduate level program with classes only
a few weeks long, creating a pattern can be difficult to do. I have created a Wiki in three prior classes
and every time the process for creating Wikis have been different. This continual change disrupts the pattern that
Mader discusses and hinders the learning within the communities of practice as
each member tries to figure out the new process
Resources:
Hazari, S., North, A., & Moreland, D.
(2009). Investigating pedagogical value of Wiki technology. Journal of information systems
education. 20(2). 187-198
King,
K. P., & Cox, T. D. (2011). The Professor’s Guide to Taming Technology.
[Kindle PC Version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com.
Pratt,
D. (1998). Five Perspectives on Teaching
in Adult and Higher Education. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
West, J. A. and West, M. L. (2009) Using Wikis
for Online Collaboration. [Kindle PC Version].
Retrieved from Amazon.com
Thank you for your insights on facilitating learning by proving scaffolding. Bodrova and Leong (1998) state that for successful scaffolding to happen, students receive an optimal amount of their teacher's support to fulfil a task, with the level of assistance reducing progressively towards independent learning (as cited in Choi and Wong, p. 4). The use of scaffolding in the classroom instruction provides students to access their prior knowledge to make connections with the content. Instructors should be aware that the use of scaffolding sometimes can be a time-consuming task. However, its benefits outweigh the time demands. Thank you for this wonderful learning opportunity!
ReplyDeleteChoi, Tat Heung, and Wong, Wai Ching Crystal. ""Platform Nine and Three-Quarters" and More: Scaffolding ESL Writing through Teacher Modelling and Creative Imitation." TESOL Journal 9.4 (2018): 1-23. Web.
Hello Chaser!
ReplyDeleteI also appreciate your mention of scaffolding and touching on Pratt's (1998) Apprenticeship perspective between learners. I had always thought about it from instructor to learner, rather than peer to peer, but it does fit. I also think that it allows for cross mentoring and coaching leadership styles as outlined by Goleman et. al (2013), which would allow for learners to flex their leadership styles if they were so inclined. In the wiki environment the coaching leadership style would work well as it would allow resonance among the learners and an environment where it is okay not to know and growth is encouraged. That said there are always the dissonant leadership styles, such as pacesetters and commanders, which sometimes cause people to dig in their heals or rebel against the dissonant leader (Goleman et. al, 2013), even though they are trying to move things forward for the group. Being empathetic and taking into account people's strengths rather than perceived weaknesses can allow for a fruitful learning environment in the adult learning, and in this case, wiki arena.
Thanks for sharing!
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2013). Primal leadership : Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence(Tenth anniversary ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.